Figuring Out Buyer Behavior #2
Interviews
·
Hunter
·
Grant
·
Olivia
Alternative Solution
I
started my interviews with Hunter. He said that when he is looking for a
solution, the thing that has the best quality and best price are the deciding
factors. He said that he would pay more if it was going to mean higher quality.
Style did not matter to Hunter if it solved his problem and wasn’t too complex.
Hunter did have more than one factor that influenced his decision. Quality and
price are the combined factors that influence his decision.
Grant was different from Hunter because he valued quality.
He said he would not mind paying a premium if it meant the best quality. Style
is a smaller influence on him because he is already planning on spending more
money so he trusts that the style will be a good one.
Olivia’s responses were like Hunter’s. She looks for the
solution that offers the best quality at the best price. She said that she does
consider style in her decision because she doesn’t want to get something that
is awkward or unordinary.
How and where they buy
Olivia
said that she likes to do her shopping at the store first. She explained that
it makes the decision easier because she can physically see what she is
getting. She said she will shop online if she can’t find what she is looking
for in a local store. Olivia also said that she likes to use cash to pay
because long term finances are difficult for her to keep up with. She said that
she makes her purchase decision by herself based on how money she has allocated.
Hunter said that shopping online is his method because of
the variety he can find. He said that it is easier for him to search for
something online than to look for it in the store. Hunter said that he usually
tries to pay cash but if it is something very expensive, he will finance if he
doesn’t pay too much interest.
Grant said that he looks online because it is easier for him
to see reviews on the things he buys. He said that reading the reviews helps
him to determine the level of quality he is seeking. He said that it is easier
to see more similar options online than to have to look around in a store and
judge something on his initial opinion.
Post-purchase evaluation
Olivia’s
evaluation of what she bought comes down to how well the quality held up. She
said that if something broke or caused problems after the purchase she would
not buy it again. Grant said that the quality had to be a long lasting one too.
If it started to deteriorate within a month of the purchase or lose value than
he would be upset with the amount of money he spent. Hunter said that if he
financed something and it started to deteriorate before he finished paying it
off than it was a bad decision. He said if it lasted longer than the financing
period and the typical warranty period, than it was a good decision.
Interview Summary
Everyone
was affected by more than one factor when deciding. They differed by the extent
to which each factor mattered. A combination of best quality and price were the
most favorable option. I agree with the choice because it is the same way I
make most of my decisions. I think Hunter is right about the solution needing
to last for a certain period under a guarantee. This will make a stronger focus
on quality, but it will be worth it if it keeps people from regretting their
purchase.
Conclusion
Based on
this segment, I would design my product to be one that is a fair price and the
best quality I can get for that price. I would like to avoid making people finance
anything so it would have to be a lower price than what a premium would charge.
I would try to do more research on exactly what price range would be acceptable
for my target market. I would also make my service online so that it will be
easily accessible and much easier to see the other alternatives that I may be
offering.
No comments:
Post a Comment